Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 11:33 am
But the concept of "dual insulation" plays a big role in the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
Golan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Whether the rational basis standard of review should be used to evaluate DOMA is also before Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern District of New York in Windsor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Olhovsky, No. 07-1642 Sentence for possession of child pornography is reversed and remanded for resentencing where: 1) defendant's sentence was substantively unreasonable; and 2) the sentencing court erred as a matter of law in refusing to allow his treating psychologist to testify at the sentencing hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm
BancorpSouth v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am
Is “substantial harm” different from the “real and substantial tort” test set out by the Court of Appeal in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) – which has been applied in a number of recent cases (see our post here)? [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The "it," of course, is negligence per se based upon claims that the defendant somehow violated the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act ("FDCA").Pull up a cyberchair and pay attention because we're going to explain some ways of defeating such claims - as a matter of law - that you probably haven't considered.First, a little bit on why FDCA-based negligence per se is so dangerous and difficult a cause of action to deal with. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
This is another thedirty case, and it's another puzzling Section 230 loss like the Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
