Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am by admin
A simple 16-page illustrated guideline which serves as a basic introduction to parliamentary procedure is the A-B-C’s of Parliamentary Procedure. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The USGCD eventually notified the individuals that the USGBC had looked into the matter and found everything to be fine. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:12 am by Adam Klarfeld
  Generally, for these exceptions to apply you need: (a) an assailant with some personal animosity (outside of Flonkerton, or whatever Olympic event you are dealing with) toward the victim, (b) someone’s actual intent to injure someone else, or (c) a co-employee’s gross negligence. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
(as on the day before) and Mr M. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
That such matters are intrinsically private cannot be reasonably doubted. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high! [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 pm by Orin Kerr
§§ 13–705(M), 13–3553(C) (requiring consecutive sentences for each conviction of sexual exploitation of minor under fifteen). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
” I’m betting that the legislature takes Option C. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
 Xavier Alvarez was initially found guilt of violating provisions 18 U.S.C/ §§ 704(b) and (c)(1) of the Act, for stating in a board meeting of the Three Valleys Water District in California: “I’m a retired marine of 25 years. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Brandon Kain
The causes of action advanced by the plaintiff were essentially twofold: (1) breach of the implied warranties of quality and fitness in ss. 18(a) and (b) of the B.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
(b), (c) & (f), as amended by Stats. 2011, ch. 15, § 482.) [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
I’m sympathetic when someone breaks their leg falling off a defective bike (like the bikes on the CSPC’s annual list), but given the costs and difficulty involved, it’s not a viable case unless they suffer a spinal cord or brain injury. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
In the post-New Deal era, mandate opponents were unlikely to argue for protecting freedom of contract as a matter of substantive due process. [read post]