Search for: "Patrick v. State"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 2,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
” Aaradhya Bachchan v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
Greece” (18.06.2020), and “Tashev v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
” Leahy emphasized recent rulings in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Articles: Patrick S. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
- Generic manufacturers aggressively promote expensive doxofylline over price controlled equivalent theophylline: (Spicy IP), Middle East – Ranbaxy strengthens presence in Middle East region: (GenericsWeb), Scotland: Future funding of stem cell companies in Scotland dependent on EPO Enlarged Board of Appeals’ decision on stem cell patentability: (IP finance), South Africa: More on AIDS/access debate - Patrick Bond article on Thabo Mbeki’s AIDS policy: (Afro-I [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Florio v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the case of Huerta v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court in Heckler v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
Jensen.Representing Appellees (Defendants): Patrick J. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm
In Whyte v. [read post]