Search for: "Patrick v. State"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 2,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The Court granted review in the following cases:Michael Patrick Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
Michael Patrick Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
Kennedy and Patrick J. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:47 am
., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
In State of Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
In the US Senate,Senator Edward M Kennedy (D-Ma) and Patrick J. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
In the US Senate,Senator Edward M Kennedy (D-Ma) and Patrick J. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:30 am
This is in spite of a clear ruling from the European Court of Human Rights in Rakevich v Russia in 2003, where it was stated that "the detainee's access to the judge should not depend on the good will of the detaining authority".The 2001 Act provides that a person may be removed to an approved psychiatric centre by members of staff of the approved centre in certain circumstances (s.13). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
" The landmark 1953 case that gave vitality to the "state secrets" privilege was United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
Dunn won in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
Baude, et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:21 am
Dunn won in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Patrick Donohue. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
Patrick v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 4:13 pm
Now the Bay State may join-in. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
See Muniauction, Inc. v. [read post]
