Search for: "People v High" Results 2301 - 2320 of 15,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am by Sherry F. Colb
These are the people who believe the free exercise of religion means the right to penalize other people for violating your religion (no cake for you Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In 2021, the pace of changes abated with: The government seeking to make changes to continuous disclosure laws permanent and extend the diminution in investor protections to Australia’s misleading and deceptive conduct laws; A High Court decision in Wigmans v AMP on competing class actions; and A further Federal government move to restrict by imposing an arbitrary cap on litigation funding commissions and legal fees   While 2021 was not a record-breaking year… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am by Stephen Griffin
 Based on the commentary so far, I’m not convinced anyone has a firm grasp on the consequences that would follow should the Supreme Court use the Dobbs case to overrule Roe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Donald Clarke
We can see this in the ICJ’s decision in Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]