Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The New York Times' "Square Feet" column today posted "Lessons on Limits of Eminent Domain at Columbia," about the recent decision in Kaur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
’ – R. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The general practice, prior to 1 October 2019, already was to issue in the Queen’s Bench Division (“QBD”) in order that the matter could then be heard by a specialist judge with experience of these types of disputes. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:41 am
Almost one year ago, the IPKat reported on Force India Formula One Team Ltd v Etihad Airways PJSC and Aldar Properties PJSC [2009] EWHC 2768 (QB), a Queen's Bench (England and Wales) decision of Sir Charles Gray (see the IPKat earlier post here). [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:37 am
The team effort in the organisation between Queen Mary University of London, Bocconi University and Insight Studio Legale culminated in an afternoon packed with many exciting discussions. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:52 pm by David Cheifetz
One of the scheduled speakers is Professor Erik Knutsen (Queens), the author of the article extensively quoted and relied in Clements. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
The Barone Case In Barone v Barone, 2017 NY Slip Op 50229(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Feb. 17, 2017], Frank Barone, himself critically ill at the time of trial, sued the wife of his deceased brother Joseph Barone seeking a share of the real estate fortune valued at $40 million she inherited from Joseph. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:48 pm by Hank Fasthoff
If defendant really wanted to differentiate the new Hellspawn, why not make him a Portuguese explorer in the 16th century; an officer of the Royal Navy in the 18th century, an idealistic recruit of Simon Bolivar in the 19th century, a companion of Odysseus on his voyages, a Roman gladiator, a younger brother of Emperor Nakamikado in the early 18th century, a Spanish conquistador, an aristocrat in the Qing dynasty, an American Indian warrior or a member of the court of Queen Elizabeth I? [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:32 am
  Most famously, in Sellars v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:32 am
  Most famously, in Sellars v. [read post]
The recent decision in Alta Energy Luxembourg S.a.r.l v The Queen[1](“Alta Energy“) might be a new high-water mark for taxpayers in treaty interpretation, but it may also be their last win. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:53 am by familoo
I can’t quite work out what happened vis a vis damages, because that aspect of the claim was hived off and sent to the Queen’s Bench Division, and I can’t find any reported judgment on it. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:47 am
Westover, 359 U.S. 500 (1959), and Dairy Queen, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:14 am by INFORRM
The same judge has recently returned to the point in O’Farrell v O’Farrell ([2012] EWHC 123 (QB)). [read post]