Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 33,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2015, 7:34 am
Re-tweak: People do what is in their interest, which is to say what they believe is socially desirable, and that won't square up with what they do when no one's looking. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
So, that's why I'm just now doing a post about a May 2009 House Ways and Means hearing on investment protection. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 am
"That's the State of our City. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
The newly-shaven David M. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
The basis for this argument was s.21(4) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which states that when an in rem action is brought, the person liable in personam must be the beneficial owner of the vessel. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
The basis for this argument was s.21(4) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which states that when an in rem action is brought, the person liable in personam must be the beneficial owner of the vessel. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
On Tuesday, I wrote about the constitutional* question raised the government’s interest in transferring John Doe—a dual Saudi-U.S. citizen in U.S. military custody in Iraq—to another state. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
NWC’s Executive Director Stephen M. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 11:48 am
By Danielle M. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am
I’m sparing these topics for today’s blog simply because SCOV decided Paige’s appeal on a different basis altogether: his case is moot.A case becomes moot, as SCOV notes, when there ceases to be any actual controversy, or where the parties no longer have a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the case. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am
I’m sparing these topics for today’s blog simply because SCOV decided Paige’s appeal on a different basis altogether: his case is moot.A case becomes moot, as SCOV notes, when there ceases to be any actual controversy, or where the parties no longer have a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the case. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:49 am
I’m not so sure I would be willing to hand that control over to the mediator. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:30 pm
Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott (Center for Individual Rights) and M. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:34 am
I hope our state leadership takes a hard look at this and other similar cases and determines that these individuals are not acting in the best interest of TDCJ or the State of Texas as a whole. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:08 am
In their paper “A Great Game: The Dynamics of State Competition and Litigation” (here), Ohio State Law Professor Steven Davidoff and Notre Dame Finance Professor Matthew Cain analyzed the M&A related litigation during the period 2005 to 2010. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:46 pm
In today’s world, any ‘developed’ nation that does not strive to develop risks losing its global competitive edge. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:42 pm
In fact, there are many nuances to victims’ involvement in the criminal system, to the extent that the State’s Attorneys Office in CT testified against a proposed bill. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:53 am
For a more, let's call it balanced world view, you must also hop on le métro and stop at Porte Dauphine in the XVI arrondissment, and stroll to Rue de la Faisanderie where you will find a very special place at number 16. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 10:49 am
I'm going to explore some scenarios that might ensue from the current state of U.S. law on child pornography.I'm not arguing that these or any scenarios will come to pass . . . . [read post]
