Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2301 - 2320 of 6,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But restrictions on speech that is outside the CDA's scope should not be seen as immunized by § 230(c)(2). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
And appellant did not provide Detective Malainy with any sales receipts for car parts.State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Compare Robert Spoo’s discussion of courtesy of trade among 19th c. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:09 am by Madelaine Lane
Panko, No. 141958, in abeyance pending the Court’s decision in Tusu v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
The Court rejected this argument as the Kiko's project is absolutely constant in most of the sale points. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by Daniel Cappetta
There was evidence that the defendants were involved in drug sales with the male victim. [read post]