Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 2301 - 2320 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
A Tragic Video Confession You might remember the viral video of an Arizona man, 22 year old Matthew Cordle, who caused a fatal drunk driving accident. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The police got a search warrant for Terebesi's home after they had reason to believe he had stashed away a small amount of drugs. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:25 am
Over a two day period in the end of August, members of the police force conducted investigations and obtained nine search warrants for residential properties in various locations throughout the area. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
 The defendants filed a motion to suppress, arguing the warrant was the product of an illegal search and seizure, but the motion was denied. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm by Dane Johnson
The Court upheld the seizure as valid under the Fourth Amendment, as well as Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, which makes warrantless entries and searches unreasonable unless one of a few narrow exceptions applies. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
California in 2014—in which judges ruled in favor of requiring a warrant for electronic search and seizure. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:43 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case, the court hold that the weapon found in the man's home may not be suppressed since by combining the allegation in the search warrant with the averment in the affidavit that the man has concealed on his person and in his residence, a revolver for which he has no permit, there was sufficient authority for the search of the man's home and the seizure of the revolver found therein. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
Colon-Gentile, supra.As Wikipedia explains, the 4th Amendment establishes a right for citizens to be free from “unreasonable” searches and seizures, and defines a “reasonable” search and/or seizure as one conducted pursuant to a warrant. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At trial, the man not only attacked the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant the search and seizure, but sought to fortify his attack by a contention that the warrant giving the basic right to search and seize was in itself void. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 6:53 am by Steven Eversole
In most cases, officers are required to have a search warrant in hand. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
All citizens, at least in theory, enjoy the right guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
All citizens, at least in theory, enjoy the right guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:00 pm
In most cases, officers are required to have a search warrant in hand. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:30 pm
The Court indicated that the search warrant authorizing the seizure of medical records should provide that the medical records be sealed once they are seized. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
Patrick Leahy proposed a tepid solution to the fact that we have a secret court in the United States of America that approves searches and seizures, despite also having a Constitution that says we can’t have secret courts, and we must have due process. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to the illegal search and seizure, the defendant had not incriminated himself. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Supreme Court’s ruling, as covered by CNN, that law enforcement must obtain a warrant to search cell phones seized during arrest. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:07 pm
The Missouri Constitution currently has a search and seizure provision that largely matches the text of the federal Fourth Amendment: That the people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes and effects, from unreasonable searches and seizures; and no warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing the place to be searched, or the person or thing to be seized, as nearly as may be; nor… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
 Narramore did not have consent or a warrant to search [Clark’s] smartphone at that time. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am by SHG
  Gid gives the short version of the undisputed facts: The relevant facts are important because they are preposterous: the police were looking for a man named Gomez, for whom they had a warrant for violation of probation and had allegedly received a tip that he may be armed. [read post]