Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
[1] Black v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Summary of Decision January 7, 2014District Judge Sharpe delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Graham v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Aside from the inevitable coarseness of the filters, if this is nudging it is nudging with sharp elbows. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
This point was highlighted in a recent case, Sharp v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
On December 19, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a brief order in the long-running Doe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:37 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court declined to hear an unusual challenge to the program by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which had sought to bypass lower courts.ADDED: Orin Kerr has some sharp analysis:Judge Leon’s first and most fundamental move is to distinguish Smith v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
For this reason, he -- and others -- might perhaps have very legitimate concerns that the judiciary needs to keep a very sharp eye out in this area, as it's the only effective bulwark against potential prosecutorial tyranny (or at least injustice).But it struck me that there's one other substantial thing at work here as well. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:40 am
Sharpe, which ended up with a $200 an hour charge against the wrongful side, were as follows: 1. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:40 am
As described in the blog, the steps to the most recent decision, Bergen v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
Indeed, the strain of critique that denies or rejects the importance of a sharp distinction between responsibility and duty makes it harder to critique the GP on its own terms. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:12 pm
In Sharpe v The Worcester Diocesan Board Of Finance Ltd., (UK EAT, Nov. 28, 2013), Britain's Employment Appeal Tribunal remanded for further consideration an appeal by an ordained minister in the Church of England who argued that his service as a Rector is covered by the Employment Rights Act 1996. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
And over twenty years ago, in Lujan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:40 am
I will, however, do a preview post on the forthcoming Oracle v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
Which matters a lot when there's a sharp dividing line -- e.g., .08 -- between guilt and innocence.One reason for the "roughness" is what's called the "partition ratio". [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Ellerth and Faragher v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Moreover, he did not believe that the impasse could be overcome through an amendment to the Constitution, for he regarded Article V's supermajority requirements as virtually encoding gridlock into the amendment process. [read post]
