Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2017, 8:42 am by Matthew Landis
Lynch, the answer is yes, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division) (forthcoming)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Title: Golan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Anthony Lake
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the forerunner of the Court's landmark decisions in Blakely v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Kavanaugh, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, handed down an opinion denying the plaintiffs’ motion to remand in a case that is a little wild.The facts of the case state that on August 30, 2006, Antonio Raspa was shopping with Michael Egierd at the Home Depot when both of them were attacked and bitten by a raccoon. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Kavanaugh, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, handed down an opinion denying the plaintiffs’ motion to remand in a case that is a little wild.The facts of the case state that on August 30, 2006, Antonio Raspa was shopping with Michael Egierd at the Home Depot when both of them were attacked and bitten by a raccoon. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:56 am by Jane Sarma and George Viopoulos
Frescati, as the statutorily responsible party, and the United States (through the Fund) then pursued legal claims against the sub-charterers, CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Becker Case number: 14-cv-02827 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey) Case filed: May 5, 2014 Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 12, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-52 SEC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:36 am by Sean Wajert
In fact, they said New Jersey law should control all of the potentially hundreds of thousands of class members’ claims and recoveries throughout the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:33 am by William Carleton
One famous opinion, from the Supreme Court of New Jersey in New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 7 January 2021, Facebook suspended the account of Donald Trump, President of the United States for an indefinite period. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Beck, et al.
The plaintiffs, who were from all over the United States (but not from New Jersey), invoked diversity and asserted claims under, of all things, New Jersey law.The defendants moved to dismiss on a bunch of grounds, including extraterritoriality and preemption. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Finally, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
 We cannot help but mention that now the "science" behind Accutane IBD claims has been held to be inadequate in both United States federal courts and Canada, leaving one judge in New Jersey as the outlier. [read post]