Search for: "State v Edge"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 2,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
(The procedural vs. substantive dichotomy traces, of course, to the Supreme Court’s interpretation of its 1938 ruling in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
Arizona is suddenly on the cutting edge of e-discovery law, with a new decision from the state's supreme court. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:40 am
State, 174 Md. 292, 198 A. 724 (1938). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Brinker and Dukes v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
My overall sense is that the attorneys submitted a piece of legal advocacy that was on the bleeding edge of what you can do without being forced to admit that your arguments are wrong and that you're asking for a change in the law. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Sentencing Memo., United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:17 pm
Water’s Edge Homeowners Association v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:05 am
The first defendant secretary of state had enforcement powers that were equivalent to those enjoyed by the agency. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
I know, you're all on the edge of your seat wondering why not a permanent abatement? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
The press quoted me, but not that line.Since then, we have the Rivera/McCloud decision and a decision from a federal judge saying thatOhio's method of execution by lethal injection is a system replete with inherent flaws that raise profound concerns and present unnecessary risks.And the state fiddled with its protocol again, tinkering around the edges but not addressing any of the substantive concerns.So here's what we know. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
Lee], Gagne [v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
The Doctrine traces its roots to a 1947 Supreme Court decision, Hickman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:31 pm
After all, no one expects that even if Massachusetts wins, that will entail the overruling of Loving v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Bullard v. [read post]
