Search for: "State v. Browne" Results 2301 - 2320 of 8,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing)   Earlier this year, the Supreme Court  heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Even though the state’s grand juries discovered that thousands of victims had been abused by hundreds of priests, the legislature has refused to open state courts for the victims. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The identification principle requires a prosecutor to demonstrate that a company’s culpable state of mind is established through the actions and intentions of an individual who embodies the directing mind and will of that company. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:43 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 612 states that Except as otherwise provided in criminal proceedings by section 3500 of title 18, United States Code, if a witness uses a writing to refresh memory for the purpose of testifying, either-- (1) while... [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am by Brian F. Jackson
To the relief of employers, Browning-Ferris quickly appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 6:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Underwriters, and as far back as the 1896, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Brown v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Brown (06-939), involving whether states may bar employers from using public money to influence the outcome of union organizing campaigns. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am by Rob
  This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]