Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2024, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
State Bar of Nev. (1991) (upholding restrictions on statements by attorneys); In re Application of Dow Jones & Co. (2d Cir. 1988) (holding that the "district court was justified in considering the imposition of a 'gag' order on trial participants"); Skilling v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
” The assistant district attorney then explained, in an annoyed tone, that any paper written and signed by the judge qualifies as a “court order. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the validity of the FCC order. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:29 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Brown, which concerns whether Maryland may ban semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, and Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The solicitor general now seeks review, supported by the District of Columbia and 20 states, which have filed a friend-of-the-court brief. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Denry Okpor v London Borough of Lewisham, Bromley County Court 25 October 2011 [Transcript not publicly available] Adam Wagner represented Mr Okpor in this case. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:54 am by Lovechilde
Seattle School District No. 1, he claimed that a plan to desegregate public schools violates Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:02 am
Issue: Whether the district court erred in concluding that Wyo. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:20 am by Lyle Denniston
District Courts, where the cases challenging the marriage bans had originated. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
This lawsuit comes two months after the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the historic August 2010 decision of the Federal District Court that found California’s Proposition 8 unconstitutional. [read post]