Search for: "State v. Land" Results 2301 - 2320 of 13,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
Texas, which raises whether the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) validly subjects states (and state officials in both their official and individual capacities) to damages liability. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:41 am by Pauline M.K. Young
Montclair State asserted this position largely based upon the 1972 New Jersey Supreme Court case of Rutgers v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
  (Subscription required.)BackgroundFiled by Newman Ferrara back in May of 2016 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the lawsuit, entitled Lennen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am by Arthur F. Coon
On January 17, 2017, the California Supreme Court denied the losing appellants’ petition for writ of supersedeas, stay request, and petition for review of the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Mission Bay Alliance v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by randal shaheen
A Richmond criminal defense lawyer who blogs at Richmond Criminal Defense News has been charged with misconduct by the Virginia State Bar because of a bar rule that requires lawyers who advertises case victories to include a disclaimer that every case is different and that prior results don’t guarantee future success. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]