Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm
He is our fifth Lord Chancellor in just five years. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Loving v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Press Gazette reports on the House of Lords debate on the Investigatory Powers Bill, noting suggestions that the Bill could put journalists and their sources in danger. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:00 am
" Steinhausen v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am
This followed the approach of the House of Lords decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven where the same test is applied where the Mesothelioma could have been caused by wrongful exposure to asbestos where there are two or more potential defendants. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
The Judge stated that in order to succeed with the summary judgment application, the [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
Lord Reid stated in McGhee v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
United States Smartmatic, [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am
On 19 December 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in The NOCO Company v Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1502. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal… [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Brentwood Borough Council v Ball & Ors [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB) This was the hearing of an application for an injunction by Brentwood BC. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
