Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 11,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
An analysis of the reported cases on jurisdiction agreements reveals that jurisdiction agreements are jettisoned on three main grounds as presented below. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Hodge and Lord Sales gave the main judgment with which Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Leggatt agreed. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
With reference to JLR v Ineos Holdings (see IPKat analysis here), it was noted that an initial recognition figure of 32.5% was statistically significant. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
Section 6 – Emergency Assistance The Artemis Accords echo the language of not just the Outer Space Treaty, and particularly Article V, but also the 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (known as the Rescue and Return Agreement), which in Article II stipulates that states must take all possible steps to rescue the personnel of a spacecraft and render all necessary assistance. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
The main function of the WTO is to “facilitate the implementation, administration, and operation, and further the objectives” of the WTO Agreement and the multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am
In Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc (“Microsoft”), an employee was wrongfully dismissed because his employer had failed to bring a harsh termination clause to his attention. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:32 am
The first of two cases argued Monday, Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
For example in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:03 am
The Facts Of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
The Nokia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 5:58 am
The Opinion Letter referenced the Supreme Court decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
