Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 45,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2022, 8:43 pm
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
As recently stated by this Court in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:25 am
In Duhon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
” With its decision in Hall v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
" Applying United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
One notable consequence of high state cigarette excise tax rates has been increased smuggling as people procure discounted packs from low-tax states and sell them in high-tax states. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:03 pm
Brown (formerly Perry v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:03 pm
Brown (formerly Perry v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:59 am
" Whether the blank is filled in by an out-of-state case, a law review article, or a case that's now up in the California Supreme Court.Similarly, I can understand why a trial court might refer to those arguments as shorthand by referring to the now-unpublished case. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm
The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
” People don’t live in one state, forever, though. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:32 pm
Check the U.S. v. [read post]
