Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 43,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2024, 11:10 am
On October 31, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a letter opinion in Martin Floreani v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
The Court found nothing in the record indicating the police acted in bad faith. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Pearson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
In Alvarado v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
This means all law enforcement, including local, state, and federal agencies must destroy the records of arrest and the request to destroy such records. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
See, e.g., Gonzales v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:51 pm
" Delay in Board Investigation: The relevant section, 14-404(j)(2), states "If the Board is unable to complete the disposition of a complaint within 1 year, the Board shall include in the record of that complaint a detailed explanation of the reason for the delay. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court in Gideon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 1:16 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:01 am
In Minnesota, as in many states nationwide, the priority of loans secured by mortgages on real property is normally determined by the order in which the mortgages are recorded. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Soemtimes I can figure things out on my own, even when they're not expressly stated. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:09 am
In McGrath v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:07 am
Chatman: A Missed Opportunity for Batson and the Peremptory Challenge Abstract: In the 2015 Term, the United States Supreme Court decided that the prosecutors in Foster v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
Sarah Morrison and Korey Kaul won in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Wade with Dobbs v. [read post]
