Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 4:47 am
See, Taylor v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
” ** Although it could be argued that the use of the word “State” limits the negotiation of alternative disciplinary procedures to the State and employee organizations representing State workers, in practice alternatives to statutory disciplinary procedures have been negotiated by political subdivisions of the State and employee organizations representing employees of such political subdivisions for decades. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:20 pm
Several states have already done this… Hawaii and Arkansas, most recently. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:38 am
Becker's update also included Welk v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 2:04 pm
The case IWOI, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
" Taylor I, 509 F.3d at 843; United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:22 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
Hoang v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
NoveltyThe test for determining whether the invention lacks novelty is the ‘reverse infringement test’ as set out in Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 where Aickin J stated (at 235):‘The basic test for anticipation or want of novelty is the same as that for infringement and generally one can properly ask whether the alleged anticipation would, if the patent were valid, constitute an infringement’. [read post]
21 May 2011, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
The executor of the estate must, at all times, act with the best interests of the estate in mind, Taylor v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:22 am
V argas, Represe nting No ncitizen Crim inal Defe ndants in New Yo rk State , 3d. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Taylor Longterm Care Center, Inc., et.al., No. 2008-CIV-3740 (Lacka. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:22 pm
State. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” ** Although it could be argued that the use of the word “State” limits the negotiation of alternative disciplinary procedures to the State and employee organizations representing State workers, in practice alternatives to statutory disciplinary procedures have been negotiated by political subdivisions of the State and employee organizations representing employees of such political subdivisions for decades. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
