Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Taylor, 295 F. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
See, also, Taylor v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Telford Taylor, the chief NMT prosecutor, came to think of the trial program as a failure. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am
In Thacker v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:30 am
In the seminal case of State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Taylor Machine Works, 689 N.E.2d 1057, 1100 (Ill. 1997). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Taylor, 733 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds, see Scala v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
The Colorado Court of Appeals analyzed such questions in its December 2021 decision in Dream Finders Homes, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
