Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT" Results 2301 - 2320 of 36,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In this case, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado held that once a case is properly removed under CAFA, the subsequent striking of class allegations does not divest a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:20 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) regarding the sealing of documents in several related cases against Apple, Uniloc scored a win when the CAFC said today that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California failed to comply with its original remand instructions, constituting an abuse of discretion. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:15 am by Valerie Mock
The Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion affirming the United States District Court for the District of Delaware’s decision that assignor estoppel did not bar the assignor Minerva Surgical, Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:20 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) regarding the sealing of documents in several related cases against Apple, Uniloc scored a win when the CAFC said today that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California failed to comply with its original remand instructions, constituting an abuse of discretion. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
” The law was set to go into effect on December 2, but on November 29, a federal district court in Austin heard oral arguments on its (un)constitutionality. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:13 pm by darren
To be more accurate, Oregonians file bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, which houses the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm by Joy Waltemath
After a state court had consolidated two separate class actions, a federal district court improperly analyzed the consolidated case as though there remained two class actions for purposes of removal to the federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), ruled the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm by Larisa Vaysman
  As early as 1972, one judge in the Southern District of Ohio opined that “[t]he adoption of a procedure for the certification of questions of Ohio law to the Supreme Court of Ohio from the United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit would seem to be a useful step toward eliminating uncertainty as to the… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 10:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law On September 29, 2021, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a former federal employee can sue the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
Acer, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), in a decision authored by Judge Dyk, held that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the district court) erred in refusing to remand a case where removal was improper under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
Before pronouncing its decision, the district court stated it did not believe the real issue before the court was whether Respondent had wrongfully removed her children to the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:09 am by Stephanie Sundier
The Tenth Circuit Judicial Council previously addressed these complaints and “held that Justice Kavanaugh’s resignation as a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and elevation to the Supreme Court of the United States qualified as ‘intervening events’ that required conclusion of the complaints without consideration of their merits. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:59 pm by Editorial Board
On February 4, Morgan Stanley disclosed in a regulatory filing that it has agreed, in principle, to a settlement for US$1.25 billion with the Federal Housing Finance Agency to resolve claims pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York related to the sale of US$10.58 billion in RMBS between 2005 and 2007. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
” The federal court denied Waterstone Mortgage’s motion by stating: Defendant has not shown that a stay is warranted. [read post]