Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 6,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
United States (08-1301) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 7:43 am
In this case, Aries Construction Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
The alleged harassment and retaliation began in 2008, when Hastings was Chairman of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Frazier recommended the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida grant the defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
In the United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:59 am
Instead it appeals solely the amount of punitive damages, confining its argument to the contention that $5,000,000 is excessive under the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
(Fla., 2016), the Florida Supreme Court declared unconstitutional, as a violation of due process under the Florida and United States constitutions, the provisions of 440.34 restricting fees to the statutory formula. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:55 pm
Colonial Grocers, Inc., the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit held that “a[n] arbitration agreement containing provisions that defeat a federal statute’s remedial purpose is still not enforceable. 124 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 4:16 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
United States, while the Court held that the property owner has the right to make a takings argument, the Court did NOT conclude that a taking had in fact occurred. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Fortunately, a Florida appellate court reversed this order on Friday, in Perez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Supreme Court has already ruled in Riley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
–NetChoice v. [read post]
