Search for: "US v. Green" Results 2301 - 2320 of 6,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by Steve
We have a can of unlicensed green beans at the house, I hope that is not a problem.3. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by John Jascob
” Furthermore, shareholders of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, which is creating a subsidiary to merge into Keurig Green Mountain in a reverse triangular merger, are retaining their shares in connection with the transaction; the appraisal statute contemplates that the shares will be relinquished (City of North Miami Beach General Employees’ Retirement Plan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:32 pm
But the 3rd Circuit's decision last week in Pell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
  In reaching this conclusion the Court of Appeal indicated that it was content to assume that a person’s right to protect his/her reputation was among the rights guaranteed by Article 8 ECHR (see Greene [68]). [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Knight (EPLAW) (IPKat) INTA special reports: Sir Robin Jacob’s speech; a century of trade mark law; damages in Europe (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform What Congress should do to fix the patent system, step 1 (Patenthink) Patent Reform Update: Summer debate ahead for America Invents Act (Patent Law Practice Center) How Article One relates to patent quality and reform (Patent Quality Matters) US Patents USPTO expands first action interview pilot program… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
The passing off case involves the adoption by the defendants of a similar get-up to that used in connection with conical kitchen measuring cups.BREAKING NEWS: UK signals green light to Unified Patent Court AgreementDarren Smyth reports on the surprising confirmation made by the UK government regarding the willingness to proceed with preparations to ratify the Unified Patent Court Agreement.Book Review: Copyright Beyond LawNicola Searle reviews Marta Iljadica book, "Copyright… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:08 am
They also claimed strict liability.The decision is Smith v. [read post]