Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 2301 - 2320 of 7,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am by Eric Goldman
The complaint. * 9th Circuit says the Americans With Disabilities Act doesn’t apply to eBay (Earll v. eBay) or Netflix (Cullen v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:15 am by David Oscar Markus
 Accepting, as we must at this stage of the litigation, the Plaintiffs’ version of the facts, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.I like footnote 1: See Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am by WIMS
It's snowy and cold today in the Eastern United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
 That meant that, under New York state law, the plaintiff couldn’t get punitives and couldn’t get attorneys fees. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
The clause states that “[t]he United States District Court for the District of Oregon may enter judgment upon any award, either by confirming the award or by vacating, modifying or correcting the award. [read post]