Search for: "WEEKS v. WILLIAMS" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Fox Searchlight Pictures, in which Judge William Pauley granted certification (and partial summary judgment) in a case involving interns on the production of the film Black Swan (See previous post here). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Fox Searchlight Pictures, in which Judge William Pauley granted certification (and partial summary judgment) in a case involving interns on the production of the film Black Swan (See previous post here). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
Late last week, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Wilkins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
On his blog, William D. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Paul previewed a seminar he attended at Roger Williams University Law School, entitled “Cyber Threats and Realities” and now is off to China for a few weeks. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:46 am by David Kemp
After assessing the legislative history of the Sixth Amendment and the purpose of the jury, the Court in Williams v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Unknown
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Blogspot
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Kader Kadem
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
Malamas that ordered appellant William Malamas to pay $63,861 in costs. [read post]