Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 2301 - 2320 of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
CKS’s findings do show that the figures cited in the President’s report are misleading, but, as we shall see, that evidence exists in other sources as well. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
United States, 484 U.S. 19, 27, 108 S.Ct. 316, 321, 98 L.Ed.2d 275 (1987) (finding that the words “to defraud” meant “wronging one in his property rights by dishonest methods or schemes, and usually signifying the deprivation of something of value by trick, deceit, chicane or overreacting”). [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
”   Florida Crystals [U S Sugar's biggest competitor – Ed.] labeled the deal a taxpayer-supported buyout of United States Sugar, and seemed to be smarting from being left out of it. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Consider Chief Justice Warren’s laconic statement in Loving v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Since January 1, 2014, the word “available” has no longer been defined anywhere in the MassHealth regulations, and the Office of Medicaid chose not to disclose the pre-2014 definition of the word “available” to the Hearing Officer, nor the agency’s long history of treating a MassHealth applicant’s home as available only when the trust principal was payable to or for the applicant. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
  Every defense lawyer in a mass tort case should take the following words to heart – and make the other side live up to their fundamental obligations as lawyers:[U]nforeseen hardship . [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Unlike in Stulman, Justice Schweitzer’s decision in SBE Wall, LLC v. [read post]
The format and the wording that is applied by authors in this text is quite variable, but this content may be still quite informative, as shown in some examples taken from Journal of Clinical Investigation, Heliyon, Nature Communication, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, and Science. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
In other words, licensors will not be obliged to license at the chip level, whether that might be regarded as a “smallest salable patent-practising unit” or not. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
  The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part II: Summary and Criticisms of the Advisory Panel’s Recommendations 1. [read post]