Search for: "Young v. Young" Results 2301 - 2320 of 11,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2008, 5:27 pm
Matter of Momot v Rensselaer County, Hudson Valley Community College Petitioner, John Momot, commenced this appeal to review a determination by the Supreme Court dismissing his petition finding no probably cause to support claim of unlawful discriminatory practice relating to education. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
. - Page 4 of the opinion, last sentence of third paragraph: I'm pretty positive that Scot Wilson -- a young attorney for CKE (and a UCSD and Pepperdine Law graduate) -- drove his fries, onion rings, and fried zucchini to Santa Fe Springs, not "Santa Fe prings". [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
Whew.It's an IDEA case involving a young autistic child, and his parent sue, claiming the school system isn't doing him right. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Held: the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, granting a declarator: that the appellant was segregated unlawfully during three separate periods, as the authorisation requirements in the Prisons and Young Offenders Institution (Scotland) Rules 2006 were not complied with; and that his ECHR, art 8 rights were violated, as during the periods in which the appellant was segregated without valid authorisation, his segregation was not in accordance with the law. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:37 am
" From the introduction:"The Multnomah Bar Association (MBA), hearing concerns among attorneys about the "Generation Gap," with some experienced attorneys questioning the work ethic of newer attorneys and some newer attorneys expressing displeasure about the life requirements imposed by their firms, decided to launch a project to understand the challenges and find solution . . . at the very least to replace complaining with constructive discussion.The Managing Partners and… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by nickleydorf
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 7:49 pm by anthonycastelli
The landmark case of Bowling v Heil which I tried with my partner involved a dump bed falling and crushing a young man between the dump bed and the rails. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Prochaska
The amended rule pursued a proper objective, but its arbitrary and disruptive impact on the lives of a large number of innocent young people made it impossible to justify. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Katharine Young
By 1977, a total of thirty-five states had ratified the ERA, falling short of the three-fourths of the states prescribed by Article V. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:56 pm
  The trial is  of a young Canadian, Omar Ahmed Khadr, on charges that include murder of a U.S. serviceman in Afghanistan when Khadr was 15 years old. [read post]