Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 2321 - 2340 of 21,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Johnson granted a temporary restraining order against state laws designed to take effect after Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Erickson (Tribal Courts; Child Custody) State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Alicia Ely Yamin
The post Reproductive Governance in a Post-Roe US: The Weaponization of Health Systems appeared first on Bill of Health. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am by Ambassador P. Michael McKinley (ret.)
They in effect give Trump and state legislatures and House members license to subvert the process again. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Daphne Keller, Max Levy
Its substantive points are relevant to EU regulators and U.S. state lawmakers currently considering transparency legislation, in addition to members of Congress. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:51 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer https://www.rrbdlaw.com/6551/securities-industry-commentator/GUEST BLOG: [In]Securities: Watching You: The SEC Walks the Beat by Aegis Frumento Esq (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)5Cir Sustains SEC's No-Deny Precondition for SettlementsSecurities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
On 5 July 2022, the Government announced its intention to amend that OSB and a separate National Security Bill to address concerns around foreign state disinformation. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm by Stuart Kaplow
If there is any question about the legal conclusions in this post, a very similar California statute enacted as Assembly Bill 979 was found unconstitutional earlier this year for the same equal protection flaw, in Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]