Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 2321 - 2340 of 6,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
And the court rejected Logan's state law defamation claim: "Illinois courts have long held that executive branch officials of state and local governments cannot be civilly liable for statements within the scope of their official duties. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
While the rationale behind Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:46 pm by Mark Alexander
The Declaration stated it to be self-evident that all men are created equal. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
  Most states, including Oklahoma until Howard, as a matter of inter-branch comity, decline to apply negligence per se to statutes (state or federal) where the legislature has not evinced an intent to allow private enforcement, and §337(a) is an emphatic expression of precisely that intent with respect to the FDCA. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am by Victoria VanBuren
Supreme Court remanded Branch Banking and Trust v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
On July 19, Opinca, purporting to be “Natalia Kostina” opened an account at a TD Bank branch and an account at a Bank of America branch, both branches being in Forest Hills, New York. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
A couple years ago, the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Amy Teng
Amy Teng is an assistant attorney general in the Washington Attorney General’s Office, which joined 22 other states and the District of Columbia on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]