Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 2321 - 2340 of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 12:45 pm
The California Courts agreed with Mazda, holding the doctrine of preemption applied. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 10:07 am by Native American Rights Fund
Hobia (Indian Gaming; Tribal Lands) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlMiccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
1Filed 11/21/08CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATIONIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFIRST APPELLATE DISTRICTDIVISION FIVEMICHAEL MORALES et al. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by Unknown
Border (American Bar Association, updated Oct. 2023) [text]"The Toll Paid When Adjudicators Err: Reforming Appellate Review Standards for Refugees," Georgetown Immigration Law Journal (Forthcoming) [preprint]"Violence in the Administrative State," California Law Review, vol. 112 (Forthcoming, 2024) [preprint]Multimedia:20th Annual Immigration Law and Policy Conference, 18 Sept. 2023 [access]Reforming Asylum for the 21st Century: A Podcast with… [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 8:56 am by Thorin Klosowski
In theory, it would work wherever your regular ID works—TSA, liquor stores, to pick up a prescription, or to get into a bar. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
  HP and Palm moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim of contributory liability and because the Communications Decency Act (CDA) barred the plaintiff's state law claims. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:49 pm
And speaking of momentous awards and M.C., congrats to her for receiving the inaugural Judith Soley Lawyer as Citizen Award from the California Women Lawyers last week at the State Bar convention in San Jose! [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
Supreme Court jurisprudence, and other indicators of significant legal change. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
Supreme Court jurisprudence, and other indicators of significant legal change. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:56 pm
  Therefore, the committee advised that the presiding justice could report the misconduct to the State Bar, which is the authority responsible for attorney disciplinary proceedings.CJEO summarizes its oral advice and posts the summaries on the CJEO website for the benefit of the bench and public.CJEO is an independent committee appointed by the Supreme Court to help inform the judiciary and the public concerning judicial ethics topics. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:17 am
The California Supreme Court upheld the death sentence yesterday for a woman convicted of torturing and killing her 4-year-old niece. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
 The political question doctrine may sometimes bar suit. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:20 pm
Zuckerman's done this for a fair piece; as the opinion mentions, he was admitted to the California bar in 1965, so he's been around for a while.The settlement conference does not go smoothly. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:54 am by John Jascob
The court explained that the plaintiffs characterized the lack of a suitability analysis as an omission for the federal fraud claim but not as an omission for the state law fiduciary duty claim.The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that the claims were not barred by the SLUSA. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:17 am by Cannabis Law Group
The Fresno County Superior Court earlier this month upheld the California law allowing licensed marijuana delivery companies to offer services anywhere in the state. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:12 am by Mandelman
The other, John Noonan, has only worked as a State Bar investigator, and has never before investigated a criminal case. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Even seriously consider bars on the windows.Oh, and don't bother investing much in a car. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:57 am by brbadmin
The California Senate will now have to sign off on the appointment of the State Bar of California’s executive director and general counsel. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm by David Ettinger
University of Southern California:  Did the trial court err in excluding proffered expert opinion testimony regarding lost profits? [read post]