Search for: "Case"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 1,079,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 5:28 pm
., October 22, 2015) (reversing and remanding denial of disability benefits for administrative failure to adequately address standing and walking restrictions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:13 pm
., October 9, 2015) (affirming trial court on Housley’s age discrimination (ADEA) claim)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:23 pm
., February 17, 2016) (vacating district court order in light of procedural irregularity an incomplete record, and remanding to insurer for further administrative appeal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
., September 9, 2015) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:11 am
., March 15, 2016) (affirming denial of social security benefits, because Bradley failed to raise his claims below, and his arguments focused on merely technical omissions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:03 pm
., July 6, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Kelly Services, although an employee need present no evidence of discriminatory intent, direct or circumstantial, in order to succeed on a failure-to-accommodate claim)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
What Is Liability in Personal Injury Cases? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Two criminal cases of note, one of which, State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 2:18 pm
Every case is different. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 2:18 pm
Every case is different. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:34 am
Massachusetts, and two months ago the Ohio Supreme Court vacated its decision in Crager and remanded the case to the trial court for determination of how or whether Melendez-Diaz applied to the particular facts of the case. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:33 am
Kidding aside, there is one civil case of significant interest next week, Burlingame v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:18 pm
., December 27, 2016) (holding that SEC ALJs are inferior officers rather than employees, and therefore subject to the Constitution's appointments clause; the ALJ presiding over Bandimere's case held his office unconstitutionally)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:35 pm
Colvin (10thCir., November 27, 2015) (affirming denial of disability benefits, Social Security Ruling 82-63’s presumption of disability in older claimants with limited education, work experience, and severe impairments)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 9:22 pm
App., July 29, 2016) (affirming denial of claim for permanent total disability because she failed to show either incorrect application of causation test or absence of substantial evidence)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:58 pm
., September 14, 2017) (setting aside Labor Commission order denying Cox's workers' compensation claim: the Commission applied the incorrect legal standard, since aggravation of a preexisting condition suffices to establish medical causation in an industrial case)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm
That case was Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:32 pm
No personal injury case is ever the same. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm
The condensed version does not include the questions presented in each case. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:54 am
The Comical Case Names page has been updated with the following entry: 4 Exotic Dancers v. [read post]
