Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 2321 - 2340
of 3,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 12:19 pm
But I wasn’t persuaded. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
The truth is, I don’t know. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:04 am
But by a 5-4 vote, the court refused to virtually eliminate the president’s power to fill vacancies when the Senate wasn’t transacting business, as a lower court had done. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
"I just don't know how to identify who those folks are. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
"I just don't know how to identify who those folks are. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:01 am
In fact, they don’t even have to tell you about the outstanding recall. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
Hobby Lobby continues with an op-ed in The New York Times from Linda Greenhouse, who contends that, “[t]o grasp the full implications of the . . . [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:36 am
” The list of things the government demands that people do (or support with their tax dollars) that are offensive to the sincerely held religious beliefs of many people is a very, very long one; one doesn’t have to be Clarence Darrow to construct the next 10,000 RFRA claims. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:59 am
” But this is well out of the mainstream of conservative thought, and none of the Catholic Justices currently in the Court have ever expressed any interest in natural law, except for Clarence Thomas back in the 1980s–when he was a Protestant. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
First, there's the lawsuit that worked it's way up to the Supreme Court which in a unanimous opinion. ironically written by Clarence Thomas who doesn't speak at all in oral argument, didn't actually resolve it. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
That the Court would find for the broadcasters didn’t worry me too much; at bottom, I didn’t think and I don’t think that the world changes a great deal depending on whether Aereo does, or does not, have to pay royalties to the broadcasters. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:13 pm
If the Senate isn’t there, it isn’t there. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
We don’t know the breakdown yet, but Breyer said the history “supports our interpretation. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
The opinion is mostly unanimous, but with some opinions concurring in part and concurring in the judgment by Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Clarence Thomas) and by Justice Samuel A. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:31 pm
I suspect he's angry that he wasn't asked, but I also think he would have said no, it wrecks his story, and isn't that probably why they didn't ask? [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:02 am
“It was like a giant poker game and I wasn’t even sitting at the table,” said a Senate campaign manager quoted in the report. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
Driehaus, arguing that “[t]here should be no question that genuinely threatened administrative enforcement proceedings should be sufficient for preenforcement standing. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:08 am
The 9-0 opinion [PDF], written by Justice Clarence Thomas, is the clearest statement yet from the Supreme Court that adding technological-sounding language to existing ideas isn't enough to get a patent. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:59 am
Justice Clarence Thomas has probably the most unique take...Wouldn't you know?!... [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Driehaus, a unanimous Court – in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas – held that a group which has been accused of violating a state law prohibiting false statements during a political campaign and that is at risk of being accused again can challenge the constitutionality of that law in court. [read post]
