Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 48,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 3:13 pm
These protections meant that Michigan v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 5:34 pm
They sought to recover from the respondents the cost of repairing and/or replacing the front seats in each class vehicle. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:42 am
Mass Transit Authority v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 11:46 am
No. 42 v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:00 am
Dansie Family Trust v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 11:38 am
Moench, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
The authorities showed that costs become incurred when they are either expended or become payable (see Brent LBC v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) / Capital & Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc [1987] 2 EGLR 49 / Hyams v Wilfred East Housing Co-Operative [2007] 1 E.G.L.R. 89); they did not become incurred merely because a liability to pay at a future date had arisen. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
The authorities showed that costs become incurred when they are either expended or become payable (see Brent LBC v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) / Capital & Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc [1987] 2 EGLR 49 / Hyams v Wilfred East Housing Co-Operative [2007] 1 E.G.L.R. 89); they did not become incurred merely because a liability to pay at a future date had arisen. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:29 am
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:09 am
HLTH Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
" [Thanks to How Appealing] The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
The RIAA has been ordered to turn over its attorneys' billing records in Capitol v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 9:09 am
In Jericho Water District v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 9:09 am
In Jericho Water District v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:47 am
Those with good memories will remember that a year or so ago the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in a case called Om Property Management Ltd v Burr (our note here) in which the issue was at what point in time does a cost became incurred for the purposes of s.20B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:47 am
Those with good memories will remember that a year or so ago the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in a case called Om Property Management Ltd v Burr (our note here) in which the issue was at what point in time does a cost became incurred for the purposes of s.20B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Hammernik v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:14 pm
Basic Research v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:47 am
Not fair, said Pal: there's a costs cap in the IPEC and its costs were unlikely to be recovered; the cost-benefit test applicable in the IPEC weighed against amendment and there were no exceptional circumstances to permit amendment under the Civil Procedure Rules, CPR r.63.23(2) [Katnote: Part 63 of the CPR deals with intellectual property claims]. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:07 pm
LSU v. [read post]
