Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 2321 - 2340 of 16,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The recent case of Canada (United States of America) v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:24 am
You can read the petition for certiorari (passed on to me by Jeff Fisher) in Missouri v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:49 am
9thCircuit-Seal_svg.png Ninth Circuit reverses conviction based on admission of the "collateral details" of the defendant's prior conviction during cross-examination on the defendant's character for truthfulness; noting a circuit consensus that specific act evidence proffered under either FRE 608(b) or FRE 609 should not include evidence of the collateral details (evidence beyond the general nature of the prior conviction and its punishment) of conduct… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 3:38 pm by Hannah Buxbaum
"  As she noted at the time, the argument challenged what remains the conventional wisdom on Congress' intent, which was that Congress had not spoken to the question of cross-border application. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm by Florian Mueller
On August 6 the Federal Circuit will hear the Microsoft-Google cross-appeal of last year's Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael Lowe
  The Governor has mandated state law enforcement to use existing state criminal trespass laws to arrest people caught crossing the border illegally. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
In that decision, all nine judges voted to strike down the Separate but Equal standard, allowing state-sponsored segregation, that had existed since the Plessy v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
The key legal questions facing Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr are likely to concern the interpretation of: (1) The Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency; and (3) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Raul "Pete" Pedrozo
China is therefore not legally prohibited from crossing the line. [read post]