Search for: "DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DIVISION" Results 2321 - 2340 of 2,902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 10:06 am by David Ingram
Justice Department division that's responsible for grants, training and other aid to states and localities. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Walsh v Kelly, 2010 NY Slip Op 09346, Decided on December 16, 2010,* Appellate Division, First Department New York City Civil Service Commission, after a hearing, affirmed the determination of the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative... [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Also, by not holding a hearing the City Council lost the benefit of judicial deference.EMMRandall comments: This is a two-way street as the Appellate Division indicated in Murane v Department of Educ. of the City of New York. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:47 am by Judicial Watch Blog
Scheduled for March 29 in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, the hearing (“Protecting the Civil Rights of American Muslims”) will feature an all-star panel of leftist civil rights leaders, including the illegal immigrant advocate President Obama appointed to run a key division of the Justice Department. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:25 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
We have some politicians knowing nothing about administration and who knows only as to how to win in elections. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
The Court held that the trial court erred in modifying his judgment and sentence to strike the DOSA language after he was administratively terminated from DOSA by the Washington State Department of Corrections, finding that the modification was not a clerical change, as the intention of the parties and the trial court had originally been to provide for a DOSA sentence. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
" ** Similarly, the Aures decision demonstrates the problem that could result if a party fails to appear at an administrative hearing as scheduled -- the hearing officer may hold the hearing "in absentia" and the determination will be binding on the parties [Aures v Buffalo Board of Education 272 AD2d 664].The Smith decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_01559.htm. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has cited Barletta Heavy Division Inc. for alleged safety standard violations. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
ValdiviaDocket: 10-848Issue(s): Do parolees in state administrative revocation hearings have a due process "confrontation right" to exclude hearsay, in the absence of a special showing of "good cause," when that hearsay would be admissible under the Confrontation Clause even against a defendant in a criminal prosecution? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm by GuestPost
In addition, the Head of Mental Health Act Policy in the Mental Health and Disability Division of the UK’s Department of Health informed the UT that although public hearings were permitted in principle in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, enquiries had shown that public hearings could not be recalled to have taken place in any of those jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:54 pm by Jennifer P. Smith
Currently, once a contested case is forwarded by the department to the Office of Administrative Law, the case is assigned to an ALJ, and a trial-like hearing is held. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(Speaking of which, one of the USDOJ budget cutting strategies suggested by the Obama Administration was "Sharing less of the proceeds from property confiscated from criminals with state and local authorities. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
The Superior Court Appellate Division upheld a lower court's decision that New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. properly denied coverage to a policyholder identified only as "D.V. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:04 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Administrative Law Licensing; standing Robert Wetzler, M.D., is the subject of an investigation by the State of Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
In considering the need for a "name-clearing hearing," the Appellate Division noted that Ortiz was not entitled to such a hearing as he did not show that his employer had publicly disclosed the stigmatizing reasons for his discharge. [read post]