Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:55 am
“STON” is not a word in English. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
M/V Vinson (D. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:55 am
One of the first cases to address the question of which party is responsible for the costs of foreign language translations was Rosado v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
Emma MunceyA further interesting decision handed down by the Judges of the English Patents Court prior to the Easter break was a judgment from Nugee J concerning proceedings between E. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Related posts:Gambazzi v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:24 am
In NTPC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
Apple’s arguments relied on a difference in meaning between the words 'hearing', 'action' and 'proceedings' in the English language version of the Regulation. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 2:58 pm
A new discovery dispute has erupted in UMG v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am
Applying the Strasbourg Court’s ruling in Agrokompleks v Ukraine (23465/03), October 6, 2011, it was clear that both the previous Ukrainian judgment in the respondent’s favour and the English judgment were “possessions” protected by the Protocol, requiring the English court to recognise the continued existence of the debt. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:41 am
Me.) in Cheng v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:29 am
Scottish Coal Company and ors v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:59 am
Ltd v Daewoo Logistics [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:41 am
In a 1993 decision called R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
In Westminster City Council v Haw [2002] EWHC 2073 (QB), Mr. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Maxol Wealth Investments Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Guindon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Baines v. [read post]
