Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by propertyprof
Sometime today we should hear if the Supreme Court decided to take up Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
 Almost all state waters west of the Florida peninsula were also closed.BP, in paid television advertising since December, depicts both tourism and commercial fishing as recovering nicely. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Among the cases up for consideration at the Supreme Court’s conference on Friday is Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
On Justia's Verdict today, you can read the second of a two-part series in which I analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Howes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm by Stan
in reply to imagethief -> Latest China Hearsay: Apple CEO Meets With China’s Vice Premier: A Guide http://t.co/oAbpdTIF -> King & Wood: New Law on Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases Strengthens the Protection for Employees http://t.co/FN6d4DFp -> Clifford Chance: FCPA: Facilitating Payments v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the individual mandate is the big fish in this pond. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the individual mandate is the big fish in this pond. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:42 pm by WIMS
§ 3372(a)(2)(A) (prohibiting the purchase in interstate commerce of fish or wildlife sold in violation of state law). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm by WIMS
      An association and several individuals who regularly use the Trail for recreating and hunting, and who support wildlife conservation (Scarborough Citizens) brought suit against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and its Northeast Regional Director, as well as the Governor of Maine and the Commissioners of the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (IFW) and Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Vladeck
" In far more detail than the federal government's brief (which, to be fair, had other fish to fry), the SEIU brief focuses on the necessary implication of the states' argument--that Medicaid has in effect become a "vested right," and that, while the original program may itself be permissible, the expansion is necessarily coercive. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am by Walter James
Tubbs would testify that had the facility actually discharged as alleged, there would have been fish kills and oily sheens would be visible. [read post]