Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 2321 - 2340 of 37,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Bipartisan Group Introduces New Bill to Allow State Taxes on Online Sales
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
Tax Policy Blog - http://taxfoundation.org/blog/
Indian Law Bulletins Updated 9/10
10 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Unknown
State of California (IGRA)Genskow v. [read post]
National Indian Law Library -- News - http://nilllibrary.blogspot.com/
[David Bernstein] Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association: How right to work came to the Supreme Court
24 Jan 2016, 11:00 am by David Bernstein
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
State RFRAs and the Intent to Discriminate: Why the State RFRAs Are in Trouble
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Supreme Court refuses to hear the Wisconsin voter ID case, which will now go into effect.
23 Mar 2015, 2:35 pm
Posner, who had written the 2007 appeals court opinion upholding the Indiana law, later affirmed by the Supreme Court.Civil rights groups had hoped the Supreme Court would use the Wisconsin case, Frank v. [read post]
Althouse - http://althouse.blogspot.com/
Webinar on PTAB Developments
5 Jan 2019, 4:20 pm by Patent Docs
Iancu and Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
Marriott loses appeal in Eden Roc case: Why all long-term hotel management agreements are now terminable.
27 Mar 2013, 9:43 am
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 27 March 2013 Hotel Lawyer with a major legal development on terminating hotel management agreements -- Marriott v Eden Roc. [read post]
Hotel Law Blog - http://hotellaw.jmbm.com/
Larrategui v. Laborde, 2014 WL 128048 (E.D.Cal.) [Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
27 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Larrategui v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Kentucky Defense Counsel Names DBL Partner David V. Kramer as “Defense Lawyer of the Year”
19 Oct 2016, 7:09 am by Dbl Law
State Farm). [read post]
DBL Law Blog - http://www.dbllaw.com/blog/
Dispute Whether Contractor Overhead & Profit Should Be Included in Actual Cash Value Payment Will Be Decided by State Supreme Court
10 Jun 2019, 9:15 pm by Daniel Ballard
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently agreed to hear argument on the matter of Kurach v. [read post]
Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog - http://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/
Case Study: Examining DEI One Year After SFFA v. Harvard/UNC
20 Sep 2024, 2:25 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
Supreme Court ruled in SFFA v. [read post]
Human Resources News - https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/
Case Study: Examining DEI One Year After SFFA v. Harvard/UNC
20 Sep 2024, 2:25 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
Supreme Court ruled in SFFA v. [read post]
Diversity Insight - http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/category/diversity-insight/
Salim v. Mitchell: ATS Suit Against CIA Contractors Survives Second Motion to Dismiss
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am by Emma Kohse
If Salim v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Colorado Oil and Gas Survives Another Challenge
24 Jan 2019, 5:43 am by Charles Sartain
The youthful antagonists were represented by the same group of actors who are behind Juliana v. [read post]
Energy & the Law - http://www.energyandthelaw.com
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm by Guest Author
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
BAILII: Recent Decisions
8 Aug 2007, 1:32 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Parti v Aysha Hamad Nassir Sabah Al-Nassir Al Sabah & Ors [2007] EWHC 1869 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Tomy UK Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWHC 1889 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Vellacott v The Convergence Group Plc & Ors [2007] EWHC 1774 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Albon (t/a NA Carriage Co) v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd & Anor (No 4) [2007] EWHC 1879 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Walker v Inter-Alliance… [read post]
Current Awareness Weblog - http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com
Live blog of "UCL Remedies" panel at the 2022 Golden State Institute
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
" The speakers are Andre Mura of Gibbs Law Group LLP; Zoe Savitsky of the Oakland City Attorney's Office; Steven E. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, S.A., a Honduran Company, Docket No. 18-16026
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, August 26, 2020, Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/