Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 2321 - 2340 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 2:27 am by gmlevine
Take for example MOWITANIA, the Complainant’s trademark in Mowitania Wendt & Molitor GbR v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:27 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
On the other hand, the General Court (GC) has recently confirmed that the sign “HELL” can be protected for coffee-related products as an EU trademark (Hell Energy v EUIPO, T-323/20, available in French and, for the adventurous ones, in Hungarian). [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch and David Hricik Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
 For example, countries may in certain areas base their company law on the UK, their trusts and estates law on Germany and their antitrust law based on the EU. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:11 am by Florian Mueller
Reuters' Dan Levine, a world-class court reporter, has just published a story on what's going on behind the scenes of the U.S. government's decision-making ahead of its Supreme Court brief in Oracle v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Salduz principle is not restricted to admissions made without access to legal advice during police questioning (Gaefgen v Germany (2010) 52 EHRR 1). [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
  An important difference from the approach taken by the UK Supreme Court in Warner Lambert v Generics is that in Germany second medical use claims (whether Swiss form or EPC 2000 form) are always purpose-bound product claims, rather than method claims. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
Moreover, significant historical events such as Algeria’s independence from France and Germany’s unification with Austria guided Irwin J to the conclusion that: … Clearly a state may go through enormous political and constitutional change, and indeed a radical change of territory, without shedding its international obligations. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information they transmit and store. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
(Patent Docs) Sitagliptin – Germany: Federal Patent Court referral concerning SPCs: C-125/10 - Merck & Co Inc v Deutsche Patent- und Markenamt (The SPC blog) Thalomid (Thalidomide) – US: Celgene, Barr resolve patent dispute over generic Thalomid (Patent Docs) Ultram (Tramadol) – US: Pharma Products L.P. v. [read post]