Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 2321 - 2340 of 21,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
” When asked about that statement in the context of Roe, Gorsuch responded: “Senator, as the book explains, the Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In one of the flashbacks that give viewers bits and pieces of the story of the collapse of the old United States and the emergence of Gilead, two of the m [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Rosen
As a result, the United States Supreme Court now protects free speech more vigorously than any other judiciary in the world. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
United States, the ongoing constitutional challenge to FOSTA/SESTA. 5. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am by Eugene Volokh
" This investigation is governed by regulations promulgated by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:48 am by Jim Dempsey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said in its 2009 United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]