Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 2321 - 2340 of 14,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
In a per curiam summary reversal, the United States Supreme Court held in Spears v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:54 am by Venkat
I found the ruling on the negligence issue somewhat confusing, but the big takeaway is that his allegation of identity theft sufficiently states a claim for negligence. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
According to the logic of The Reasoning State, whatever flaw exists in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
"Although, thanks to Ruth Ginsburg’s dedication to justice, there is hope. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:13 am
Meanwhile, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has yet to request briefing on USA Freedom in EFF’s two other cases challenging the bulk collection of telephone records— First Unitarian v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
For instance, in the landmark ruling of Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov (2007), both Lord Hoffman and Lord Hope illustrated that an arbitration clause will not be severable where it is a part of the main contract and the existence of consent to the main contract in itself is under question. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]