Search for: "Head v State" Results 2321 - 2340 of 14,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Congress headed home last weekend, so it’s a light week ahead on the Hill. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: O'Boy v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
This distressed her, because her Muslim faith prohibits her from appearing in a relative state of undress or from appearing without a head scarf before unrelated males. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
In August, a federal panel of judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the 18 states standing to contest the non-payments in a case called House v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 8:48 am by Larry
In 2005 it received a binding ruling from CBP stating that the seats should be classified as bike accessories in Heading 8714. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
But wait: Though many federal courts have held that state anti-SLAPP statutes apply in federal lawsuits based on state tort claims, others have disagreed. [read post]