Search for: "Head v State"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 14,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 8:50 am
As soon as I saw the grant, I started to scratch my head. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
Boermeester v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:23 pm
But I'm increasingly skeptical that such reform can be achieved simply with the right person heading the agency. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm
The head of U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 1:24 pm
But if you are not eligible then you probably can’t use s.1 (see R (Ncube) v Brighton). [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:20 am
Nelson said it was “preposterous” for the state and several of its witnesses to have asked jurors to ignore a host of possible contributing factors, including Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
Twenty-one states also have RFRAs. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
And you can feel the tension around the country as we head toward a verdict. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
United States (2020) and Pen America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 9:30 am
One of my fellow students at law school was Drew Days, who became the first African-American head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and later Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
Trump’s affinity for Russia or its president, Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:14 am
Hill v Helsep – former Rep. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 am
The Music/Sound Working Group was represented by Véronique Desbrosses of GESAC and Shira Perlmutter, then of IFPI and now Register of Copyrights (head of the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
The DABUS/Thaler cases mentioned below consider the problem head on – ie can AI under relevant current patent legislation be considered to be an “inventor”? [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
But Mr Handzhiyski had not engaged in any form of violence and did not physically impair Mr Blagoev’s monument – he merely placed a cap on its head and a sack at its feet, and municipal workers had removed them shortly afterwards. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
The following head note was provided:There may also be a possibility of repayment of the appeal fee under Rule 103(4)(c) EPC if a request for oral proceedings has not been withdrawn by the appellant but by another party to the proceedings who has not filed an appeal (see points 8.3 - 8.9 of the grounds for the decision). [read post]
