Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD" Results 2321 - 2340 of 5,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The law of sexting is far from settled, but the practice raises cultural issues that are at least as interesting as the legal issues. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Orin Kerr
First, as I read the language, the right to monitor appears to extend to “cybersecurity purposes” generally, not just for the protection of the network operator’s own interests. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
   According to the opinion, [m]ultiple people became `friends’ with the Facebook page at issue, allowing them to view comments and posts made on and from the Facebook page. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am by MBettman
Applying the rational basis test, the state has no legitimate public interest in protecting those who would rape a child, or those who act in concert with, aid and abet and conceal that misconduct. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:35 pm by Benjamin Wittes
I take Jenks's point but I'm not sure his point and mine are at odds. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
“I reduced my taxes from a tax break, but now that I got what I want and you want in, I’m going to stop you. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:40 am by sklemp
On the other hand, teaching a child about reconciliation and forgiveness is a powerful message. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:37 am by Jeff Welty
Juvenile curfews may implicate a number of constitutional concerns, including vagueness, infringement on a minor’s right to travel, infringement on a minor’s right to engage in communicative activities protected by the First Amendment, and infringement on a parent’s right to raise his or her child as the parent sees fit. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:37 am by Jeff Welty
Juvenile curfews may implicate a number of constitutional concerns, including vagueness, infringement on a minor’s right to travel, infringement on a minor’s right to engage in communicative activities protected by the First Amendment, and infringement on a parent’s right to raise his or her child as the parent sees fit. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
A parent seeking to relocate with a child bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed move would be in the childs best interests. [read post]
The court explained that although an older childs preference was an important factor, this factor might be manipulated by one parent and might not be in the childs best interest. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Tuesday 8 December 2015 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of In the matter of B (A child) regarding the appellant’s application for their daughter, B, to be made a warden of the court because the respondent had taken her to Pakistan. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
I’m sure other jurisdictions will be watching. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by Gene Killian
It’s a very interesting show for people who run their own businesses, because we can see many mistakes that all business owners make (and hopefully avoid them). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 10:16 pm by Jeff Richardson
I'm a fan of Apple's HomeKit technology, which lets you monitor and control various aspects of your home using an iPhone, iPad or Apple Watch — and even using Siri. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Shepherd expressed no interest in the childs birth and did not, despite a contractual commitment to the contrary, add the baby to her health insurance policy. [read post]