Search for: "In Re EM" Results 2321 - 2340 of 3,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2009, 3:12 am
Legal blogs are like small businesses: Half of 'em fail in the first year, and 90 percent of 'em fail in the next five.Maybe that's a little precise, given that we didn't actually do any empirical analysis. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:08 pm by Jared Correia
Since those in-person networking opportunities are now more precious than they have ever been, make sure you’re polished about your approach: establish your networking targets, have your elevator pitch primed and remember to connect the dots to the next opportunity: leave ‘em with a call to action. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:27 am by Mark Herrmann
There’s no way we’re hiring those guys! [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:46 am by SHG
Carolyn Elefant, no meanie (like me) when it comes the potential of technology in the law, calls ’em out. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:39 am by Jared Correia
Since those in-person networking opportunities are now more precious than they have ever been, make sure you’re polished about your approach: establish your networking targets, have your elevator pitch primed and remember to connect the dots to the next opportunity: leave ‘em with a call to action. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Pick 'em games are also not in play. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm by Randazza
We’re sure that some of ‘em are pretty nice guys and they mean well. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
TB: And I was just wondering do you have any idea when you might get those . . . bushels of sweet potatoes . . uh . . down there . . . uh where I can get em . . . uh . . . over to him? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:26 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
"    NOTHING IN THIS BANKRUPTCY BLOG CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE RE A CHAPTER 7, CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 11, OR CHAPTER 12. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
Any product that has been re-introduced in a new format or with substantial changes is also eligible. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:55 pm by Elie Mystal
But as long as we’re criticizing lawyers who need “welfare,” can’t we also criticize the law schools that put them in the poor house to begin with? [read post]