Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 2321 - 2340 of 18,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm by Bart Torvik
In an exclusive interview with ABC News, Clinton complains that the conservative justices on the Supreme Court "didn’t make the plaintiffs, the people that want to strike the law down, prove their case":“Nobody asked, for example, do they want to overturn a case called Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
We've tracked Ledbetter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:49 am
First, Obama's election will have no effect on the pending case of Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:18 am
Vohrer, In re Chagos Marine Protected Area (Mauritius v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
On the dark side, her side is the side of truth and justice, and any view that she fails to share is a lie. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Justice Breyer indicates that this would require overturning the Federal Circuit's opinion in FilmTec Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Justice Breyer indicates that this would require overturning the Federal Circuit's opinion in FilmTec Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:09 am
Lots of great reader comments concerning Charney v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:01 am by Kali Borkoski
” The ABA Journal reports on a speech recently given by retired Justice John Paul Stevens at the National Legal Aid & Defender Association, in which the Justice criticized Justice Scalia’s 1991 opinion in Harmelin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 7:31 pm
What we're reading today: "Setting boundaries for property rights" -- an opinion piece in the National Law Journal by our friend Timothy Sandefur about the Florida beachfront takings case, Stop the Beachfront Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:32 pm
In a February 2007 post, a different attorney suggested that the Supreme Court would give guidance to courts and the USPTO to know it [obviousness] when they see it, curiously citing to Justice Stewart's often-ridiculed statement in Jacobellis v. [read post]