Search for: "JORDAN v. JORDAN"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 2,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 6:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:06 am
Jordan, Louis L. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 4:48 pm
Last month, the telecommunications giant was ordered to pay the additional sum of $225,000.00 in costs In Judicial Interpretation Of Restrictive Covenants, Ottawa Business Journal provides a good summary by Jordan Plener on the January, 2009 ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in Shafron v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Failure to Function/Non-distinctiveness:TTAB Finds Religious Habit Not Registrable: Lacks Distinctiveness, Inherent or AcquiredFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No. 23: TTAB Refuses to Hear Belated Fraud Claim, Finding It Not Tried By ConsentPrecedential No. 21: TTAB Sustains "PALOMA" 2(d) Opposition to "PALOMITA" for Clothing, But Dismisses Claim for… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
Safford Unified School District #1 v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:05 am
Patil v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
Jordan, 2007 WL 1849985 (E.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co. (2000), 77 B.C.L.R. (3d) 44 and Jordan. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
In Jordan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:36 pm
In today’s case (Roed v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 9:10 am
Whether those duties were owed -- and whether the claim for their breach had been released as a part of the corporation's bankruptcy proceeding -- were the main issues yesterday in Phillips and Jordan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:57 pm
May, 22, 2009) [Download PDF]Somers v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:28 am
Morris v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
Jordan, 958 F.2d 1085, 1087-1088, 294 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:59 pm
Jordan E. [read post]
