Search for: "LITTLE v. STATE"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 4:39 pm
Write a special little section for Kennedy, appealing to his desire to look good at the next Bellagio conference? [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
For a longer version, see Rory Little's post at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Most books in this field have little or no material on the latter two topics. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 5:34 am
Department of the Interior (Indian Water Rights; Federal Trust Relationship)Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:47 am
Stover belatedly argued in reply that she could allege sufficient facts to confer Article III standing, but the court says this request comes too little too late. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
Adler v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” (para 77)“I accept that what Mr Turner was describing was obvious,…” (para 85)To state what in itself should now be obvious, Virgin won, and Rovi’s patent was held invalid for lack of inventive step over the first piece of prior art. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
We’ve talked a little about litigation around domain names of famous people. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:12 am
Per United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Piscioneri v Brisciani ([2015] ACTSC 106), the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court found that the owner and administrator of online forumZGeek is liable for discussion on it, and awarded $82,000 damages to a lawyer defamed on the site. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
As I reported on Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:03 pm
A quick visit to the SCOTUS blog revealed that the State of Louisiana has filed its final brief asking for cert regarding Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
I would suggest that there are two things:Firstly, and surely obviously, as stated by Lord Justice Thorpe in paragraph 2: "The fact that the claim arises from the dissolution of a Civil Partnership rather than a marriage is of little moment since it is common ground that the language of schedule 5 of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 is identical to the language of s.25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
” You can read more about the Scalia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:18 am
Earlier, the DOJ’s motion for continuance halted the ongoing feud between Apple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:43 am
A little decision today from the Eighth Circuit, US v. [read post]
