Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 20,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:08 am
§ 3730(b)(5), in United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
Thank goodness Clarence Gideon did not have to appear opposite you in 1963 and instead, he wrote a five page petition for writ of cert to the highest court in our land, the United States Supreme Court, which ultimately handed down the decision of Gideon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
United States. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied Microsoft Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the conviction and 180 month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in United States v, Kelley Kelley was convicted after a bench trial in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
So he's had seven additional years in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Furman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Furman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Locke v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:59 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:36 am
Since the early 1980s, the NLRB has vacillated back and forth on whether non-union employees are entitled to have a co-worker present during an investigatory interview that could result in discipline — a right that has long been afforded union employees pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s holding in NLRB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
